A new digital tool called GaitPulse is trying to solve one of the most persistent gaps in prosthetic care: what happens between appointments. In a feature published by Amplitude, the app is presented as a way for amputees to track prosthetic fit, gait, pain, comfort, limb changes, and day-to-day issues in real time, creating a clearer picture of how they are actually doing outside the clinic.
According to the Amplitude article, the app was created by Paul Tubberville, an amputee and osteosarcoma survivor who said he wanted a tool he himself would have found useful over decades of prosthetic use. The article says Tubberville chose amputation at age 20 after years on crutches and later developed GaitPulse out of frustration with how hard it can be to communicate the daily reality of prosthetic life to providers.
That problem is familiar to many lower-limb prosthetic users. Clinic appointments often capture only a snapshot, while issues such as discomfort, swelling, gait asymmetry, liner wear, pain points, or socket fit changes can shift throughout the day or across weeks. GaitPulse’s own website describes the platform as a “prosthetic intelligence platform” that cross-correlates gait, comfort, pain, and component data into one usable record.
What the app tracks
The Amplitude article and publicly shared descriptions of the app suggest that GaitPulse is designed to help users log and monitor several practical variables that matter in everyday prosthetic use. These include gait symmetry, comfort changes across the day, pain and swelling patterns, and component wear, alongside broader notes on fit and day-to-day performance. A public user description of the app on Reddit says it uses a phone’s motion sensors to assess gait symmetry and also tracks morning-versus-afternoon fit changes and component lifespan like an “odometer” for knees, feet, liners, socks, and sleeves.
That combination matters because it shifts prosthetic follow-up away from memory alone. Rather than asking patients to summarize several weeks of uneven experiences from recall, the platform appears intended to generate a more continuous, more structured account of how a device is behaving in real life. This is an inference from the app’s stated design and feature descriptions.
Why this could matter for the O&P sector
For IMEA CPO readers, the most interesting part of GaitPulse is not the app itself, but what it represents. Prosthetic care is gradually moving toward more data-informed, patient-reported, and value-oriented models, where what happens between visits becomes more clinically and commercially important. Amplitude’s coverage frames the app as a way to improve care, communication, and insurance documentation, while GaitPulse’s own positioning suggests it is trying to turn subjective prosthetic experiences into a more usable dataset.
That has potential implications across several areas:
- better communication between users and prosthetists
- earlier identification of fit or wear issues
- stronger documentation for component replacement or service need
- more consistent rehabilitation tracking over time
These specific benefits are partly inferred, but they align closely with the way the platform is described publicly.
A broader shift toward continuous prosthetic monitoring
The idea behind GaitPulse also fits a wider trend in healthcare technology: the move from episodic review to continuous wellness and function tracking. Public social posts associated with the platform describe it as helping clinicians gain updates on gait patterns, comfort, and prosthetic issues in real time, while a recent Amplitude piece on future prosthetic care emphasized the importance of making patients more informed and active partners in decision-making.
For prosthetics, this matters because walking quality, comfort, and confidence are rarely static. A limb may change through the day. A component may be functioning acceptably in clinic but causing problems over longer use. A user may not know whether an issue is normal adaptation or a signal that something needs adjustment. A platform like GaitPulse appears designed to make that grey zone more visible. This is an inference, but it is supported by the app’s stated focus on real-time prosthetic use and between-visit tracking.
Still early, but worth watching
At this stage, GaitPulse should be seen as an emerging prosthetic-care tool rather than an established clinical standard. The currently visible material is mostly app-driven and media-driven rather than backed by peer-reviewed outcome studies. Even so, the concept is worth watching because it addresses a very real issue in lower-limb prosthetic care: the lack of structured, longitudinal information between appointments.
If the platform proves useful in real-world care, it could help support a more collaborative model in which patients bring more than a memory of “good days” and “bad days” to their next appointment. They could bring a record. For the O&P sector, that is potentially significant. This final point is an inference based on the platform’s intended function.










