For orthotists and prosthetists across the Middle East and Africa, selecting the most appropriate ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) can be both a challenge and an opportunity. With diverse patient populations, resource considerations, and evolving clinical expectations, the decision goes far beyond simply choosing a brand or following what colleagues use.
Key factors to consider include:
-
Diagnosis – neurological vs. musculoskeletal conditions
-
Patient activity level – mobility goals, daily environment, and gait demands
-
Footwear tolerance – cultural preferences and footwear availability
-
Device durability & access – important in regions where follow-up visits may be limited
This complexity underscores why clinical judgment, combined with a clear understanding of device categories, is vital in patient care.
Over-the-Counter (OTC) AFOs
OTC AFOs are widely available from multiple manufacturers and offer a quick solution in acute cases. Common clinical indications include:
-
Acute drop foot following stroke, spinal injury, or illness
-
Short-term support (generally <6 months)
-
Patients with average build (height <183 cm, weight <115 kg), unless otherwise indicated
Design variables include uprights, footplates, and hinge systems. Short uprights, for example, may be suitable for average-height patients, while lightweight construction can support easier mobility.
OTC AFOs are often provided upon discharge from hospitals or rehabilitation centers. They are cost-effective and easily dispensed, but come with limitations:
-
Limited adjustability
-
Durability concerns for long-term use
-
Insurance — the regular complexities of prescribing
In some cases, CAM walkers are also categorized as OTC AFOs.
Custom-Fitted AFOs
Custom-fitted AFOs bridge the gap between mass-produced OTC devices and fully custom-made orthoses. These devices begin as prefabricated models but can be modified extensively to meet individual patient needs. Adjustments may include:
-
Heating and bending uprights
-
Altering footplates for pressure redistribution
-
Adding or adjusting padding for comfort
Such modifications require the technical expertise of an Certified Orthotist Prosthetist, . The benefit is a more tailored fit and greater patient comfort compared to OTC devices.
However, challenges remain:
-
From a coding and reimbursement perspective, custom-fitted AFOs, like OTC AFOs, are billed under a single parent code — no additional modifications can be separately coded.
-
Durability may still be a concern, particularly in high-demand environments common in the Middle East and Africa, where patients may use the same device for longer periods due to access or financial constraints.
Key Considerations for the Region
-
Patient Access & Affordability
-
In many parts of the Middle East and Africa, availability of advanced devices may be limited. Providers must balance cost with durability and patient outcomes.
-
-
Environmental Demands
-
Devices must withstand hot climates, dust, and in some areas, rough terrain — raising durability requirements compared to standard Western contexts.
-
-
Cultural & Lifestyle Factors
-
Footwear compatibility is crucial. Patients may prefer sandals, traditional footwear, or barefoot walking in some communities, requiring thoughtful AFO selection and design.
-
-
Follow-up & Maintenance
-
Limited access to rehabilitation centers may mean devices need to be more durable and user-friendly, as frequent adjustments are not always feasible.
-
Clinical Takeaway
When prescribing AFOs in the Middle East and Africa, orthotists and prosthetists must weigh:
-
The clinical indication (acute vs. chronic condition)
-
The patient’s lifestyle and environment
-
The balance between affordability, durability, and functionality
OTC AFOs may be suitable for short-term interventions, while custom-fitted devices offer a middle ground where resources allow. Understanding these categories — and tailoring them to the realities of local practice — enables clinicians to optimize patient outcomes while navigating regional challenges.